Digital Nightfall on 12/1/2010 at 16:09
Based in the teaser image my guess is that it's a game based on Qwantz.
ZylonBane on 12/1/2010 at 16:25
Oh god the entire freaking site is designed after Bioshock.
Stitch on 12/1/2010 at 16:27
Quote Posted by gunsmoke
I don't remember your personal quibbles with it but ,so far, in my mind the only flaw is it starts very slowly. The first ~3 hours are snooze city.
Wrong on a level so tragic it paints a questionable shadow over every opinion you have ever stated.
Namdrol on 12/1/2010 at 16:30
I read all that wrong, yes my idiocy ;)
Nameless Voice on 12/1/2010 at 17:08
The zombie apocalypse game sounded really nice. :(
Matthew on 12/1/2010 at 17:10
Quote Posted by Nameless Voice
I basically lost all respect for Irrational Games after the whole Bioshock DRM fiasco. Unless they've seriously changed, I don't think they
deserve to get that name back.
Is it not usually the publisher who makes the decisions on DRM? I'm afraid I'm not up to speed on this.
june gloom on 12/1/2010 at 21:09
Quote Posted by mothra
well, there's evolution and ripoff
Oh god what the fuck? How the fuck do you rip off
your own game? Idiot.
I found Bioshock a lot more enjoyable the second time around. I still have problems re: the gameplay (too many splicers, no real inventory, hyperspace arsenal, some level design quibbles) and the plot (or lack thereof, where were the fluff audiologs!?) but with the Vitachambers turned
off and my own system of only quicksaving when standing in front of one increased the tension by a lot. It's not a
bad game by any means; it's System Shock 2 Lite, and god forbid we get more games even remotely like System Shock.
Once I'd gotten over my initial disappointment the game was enjoyable and a decent play. And I have to admit, the premise is at least a thousand times more interesting than System Shock 2's generic space worms.
Nameless Voice on 12/1/2010 at 23:29
Quote Posted by Matthew
Is it not usually the publisher who makes the decisions on DRM? I'm afraid I'm not up to speed on this.
I seem to recall reading that Ken Levine approved of the draconian copy protection, though I can't find the relevant thread right now.
