Alabama sues taco bell; alleges 'taco filling' is less then 35% beef - by Bluegrime
ZylonBane on 27/1/2011 at 14:47
Quote Posted by Shug
You really have reached rock bottom with those flat rejoinders. These irredeemably terrible one-liners aren't really justifying your constant monitor high-fiving.
Y'know, you probably wouldn't be so high-strung if you'd just accept Quetzalcoatl as your personal savior.
Queue on 27/1/2011 at 15:17
Quote Posted by BrokenArts
... they don't have Taco Bell in Michigan, its a legitimate question.
I remember the first Taco Bell opening up around this area back in 1981. It was in Lansing, and too far for us to drive, though I pestered my mom continuously for the "authentic Mexican delights" that the television ads promised. Instead, I had to settle for the corn wrapped tamales that the Mexican lady next door made for us. My childhood sucked.
And now, in the town of around 2000 people that I live near, there's a Taco Bell on the corner...AND A STOPLIGHT!
And to be honest, even the locals around here would rather dine off of bird-droppings from the stoplight than Taco Bell. Besides, they're mostly busy preparing dinners of deer meat and potatoes than spending what few extra bucks they have on processed food-stuff. It's only travelers that'll make the stop for a fix of sawdust and shredded cheese-like product. Hell, for that matter I'd rather eat a deer, and I fucking hate deer.
It's not that we don't have Taco Bells in Michigan, we just don't
get them.
btw.... I'm drooling over Duck's dishes. Anyone who can't look at those and immediately get hunger-pangs has lost all sense of taste. Or never had them in the first place.
ZylonBane on 27/1/2011 at 15:38
Quote Posted by Queue
btw.... I'm drooling over Duck's dishes. Anyone who can't look at those and immediately get hunger-pangs has lost all sense of taste. Or never had them in the first place.
I know where they'd look right at home:
Inline Image:
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51QX907RWJL._bL160_.jpgStitch on 27/1/2011 at 15:48
Quote Posted by ZylonBane
Every picture MrDuck just posted looks absolutely revolting. Pureed seafood in a glass? *barfs*
I've had it and it is delicious. That said, Mr Duck is posting pictures of his loving wife in a thread about Playboy magazine.
and holy fuck do I hate that "om nom nom" bullshit
Stitch on 27/1/2011 at 15:52
Quote Posted by Shug
You really have reached rock bottom with those flat rejoinders. These irredeemably terrible one-liners aren't really justifying your constant monitor high-fiving.
It's akin to witnessing that once-talented cousin tunelessly warble through "Take Me Home Tonight" at the local karaoke bar.
the_grip on 27/1/2011 at 16:51
Quote Posted by ZylonBane
Every picture MrDuck just posted looks absolutely revolting. Pureed seafood in a glass? *barfs*
It is heaven, trust me, and it is not pureed. If it looks bad you might start with some simple ceviche and then you will begin to understand the glory of what Duck is puttin' up here.
Chimpy Chompy on 27/1/2011 at 17:10
This thread is inspiring me to try cooking some of the things duck has posted pics of (More the earlier stuff than seafood). How hard can it be? (lol famous last words)
But stitch is right, om nom needs to die.
Sulphur on 27/1/2011 at 17:31
I heard about Playboy and someone's wife in this thread and came right over...
...what's with all the shrimp?
Muzman on 27/1/2011 at 21:52
Pictures of food generally do look terrible, I find. It could go some way to explaining why all the food in advertising is outright fake or encased in resin and they go to great lengths with lighting and so on.
Only really bonkers
ars cuisine like RBJ eats looks what I would call good, in and of itself. Everything I love, I've noticed, looks like shit you couldn't even get on a stick if you tried.
Inline Image:
http://merhaba.com.au/img/p1225118875vindaloo.jpg