Fringe on 4/8/2008 at 23:57
What's the problem? Diablo II was a pretty colorful, over-the-top game. It certainly didn't suffer for it, either.
june gloom on 5/8/2008 at 01:22
Not as much as it suffered for other reasons, anyway.
BlackCapedManX on 5/8/2008 at 02:25
seconded.
I heard they were making DIII and I was like "woah! sweet!" Then I looked at it, and remembered that I didn't actually like DII (especially in comparison to DI, which was amazing) and my interested stopped right there.
Fringe on 5/8/2008 at 05:12
Quote Posted by dethtoll
Not as much as it suffered for other reasons, anyway.
dethtoll'd
dethtold?
TF on 5/8/2008 at 08:26
haha the developer saw 'wow gayness'
van HellSing on 5/8/2008 at 09:11
I'm just going to use enbseries for colour/contrast correction.
Ostriig on 5/8/2008 at 14:07
I actually had this discussion on D3's chromatics with a friend about two weeks ago. He also had a problem with the new style, but I personally don't get it, I'm perfectly fine with it. I mean, I really liked Diablo 2, but it's not the sort of game I'd ever take "seriously", to say so, and I don't see the absolute need for grittiness. Even if I can agree the "how it should look" images in the first linked article seem... sexier, and I'd probably like them better, too, it's still not the sort of thing I'd start flipping shit over.
Koki on 5/8/2008 at 14:28
I, for one, like the new, "epic" style.
