Renzatic on 29/6/2013 at 06:34
Why? WHYYYYYYYY?
Sulphur on 29/6/2013 at 07:10
What? It wasn't a blockbuster hit that could be a successful franchise to iterate on, so what is the point, even? The original was a thing of craft that will never age, so this is ridiculous. You can't even call it a cash-in.
Al_B on 29/6/2013 at 08:25
:( At least the article says it's a homage and not a direct remake - but I wish they didn't feel the need to exploit the original title if they want to make a similar film. On the upside at least this reminds me that I need to watch the film again.
SubJeff on 29/6/2013 at 10:14
Terminator, Jacobs Ladder.
Back to the Future reboot in 3, 2 ?
Muzman on 29/6/2013 at 10:20
This interview goes into why this sort of thing is happening more and more these days.
(
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_oHW31jQfg)
She doesn't know a lot about computer stuff really (although more than her peers apparently), but you get an insight into the insider perspective.
faetal on 29/6/2013 at 12:26
Ugh. Getting tired of the re-boots.
Nicker on 29/6/2013 at 15:06
Quote Posted by Subjective Effect
Back to the Future reboot in 3, 2 ?
It's like you guys are all sleepwalking.
We'll send someone into the past and sabotage the production of movies we love so the reboots will be original stories! Simple.
demagogue on 29/6/2013 at 15:28
Yeah but then those will get rebooted and they'll be suck-squared suck.
