Sniper459 on 24/5/2001 at 15:51
I saw these nanorobots with mine own eyes :eek: well!!! with the help of the AFM we designed. For related info checkout (
http://www.Topometrix.com) www.Topometrix.com
Of course the nano robots wont be on the web site...
oh and try to keep this on the DL(DownLow)
If you asked me about this in person i'd say
"If I told Ya I'd Have To Kill Ya!!!"
Sniper459 on 24/5/2001 at 15:58
oh and if you are in the the dark (like 99% of the world our Government is Technologically about 50-60 years in advance.
for example Nikola Tesla designed the first true Electric car in the 1930's!!!!! However It didnt enter the market till now. And how long ago was the SR-71 Blackbird being built. (1940's) But details have only been released to the public in 1999. And they still wont tell us its true capabilities.
So you see this is already well into development!!(nanotechnology) It will actually be deploying within the next 5-10 years(to the government anyway!!!!!!!) <IMG SRC="thumb.gif" border="0">
kostoffj on 24/5/2001 at 18:16
Quote:
Originally posted by Sniper459:
<STRONG>oh and if you are in the the dark (like 99% of the world our Government is Technologically about 50-60 years in advance.
for example Nikola Tesla designed the first true Electric car in the 1930's!!!!! However It didnt enter the market till now. And how long ago was the SR-71 Blackbird being built. (1940's) But details have only been released to the public in 1999. And they still wont tell us its true capabilities.
So you see this is already well into development!!(nanotechnology) It will actually be deploying within the next 5-10 years(to the government anyway!!!!!!!) <IMG SRC="thumb.gif" border="0"></STRONG>
I can't comment on Tesla's electric car, but the SR-71 was NOT built in the 1940s. It was developed in the early 60s and entered service in 1966. The SR-71 was a response to the U-2 no longer being able to evade Soviet air defences after the Francis Gary Powers incident. Its true capabilities are no longer a matter of great secrecy; the sole surviving Blackbird is used for civilian flight research at NASA's Dryden Research Center.
The factory that built it, though, is still greatly secret: the Lockheed-Martin Skunkworks. Skunkworks also built the F-117 and it is rumored, speculative aircraft like the Aurora.
The Government has its hands on some advanced technology alright, but 50-60 years in advance of the civilian state of the art is preposterous. Remember, the Government doesn't develop technology on its own (in most cases) - it's done by contractors.
Hmmmm... now that is a great idea for a DX fan mission though. A Skunkworks controlled by MJ12...
<IMG SRC="idea.gif" border="0">
kostoffj on 24/5/2001 at 19:18
Quote:
Originally posted by Sniper459:
<STRONG>I saw these nanorobots with mine own eyes :eek: well!!! with the help of the AFM we designed. For related info checkout (
http://www.Topometrix.com) www.Topometrix.com
Of course the nano robots wont be on the web site...
oh and try to keep this on the DL(DownLow)
If you asked me about this in person i'd say
"If I told Ya I'd Have To Kill Ya!!!"</STRONG>
That's a pretty cool site, Sniper! Thanks for posting it. I imagine that it must have been great to work at a place that did cutting edge tech like that. What sort of work did you do?
Tobbe 2-4601 on 24/5/2001 at 21:54
There is actually one way to make nanobots programable: quantum computers. Read an article about that in a swedish PC magazine. It uses quants instead of transistors, and a quant can have two states at the same time. If used for processors one quant will be like two transistor(2 transistors has 4 combinations, one quant has 4 since one quant has two states). Processors can be made extremely small and then you would be able to build programable nanobots that are highly intelligent.
TechImmortal on 24/5/2001 at 22:19
To answer a bunch of things at once - there's nanotech and then there's nanotech.
Nanotech in its general sense means anything done in nanoscale. That includes a lot of the things mentioned here by Sniper, etc. It includes being able to etch things (as IBM did) or make things (the recent wineglass) on that scale.
I know about the quants and the paint flipping. But that is very simple. Cool, but not the same as programming a complex task.
Yes, people already know how to program the nanorobots *once they can be built* - but the technology to build a truly programmable machine on that scale still does not exist.
I think I may come across as some kind of doomsayer or wet blanket, so let me make it clear - I am not. I think it is cool, and I want a few nanoscale implants myself! (Though I have no interest in being connected to the internet 24/7 - I want some peace :D )
All I'm doing is saying that the here-now technology is not yet the Deus Ex technology.
I do predict they'll have it inside of two years. Get in line behind me.
kostoffj on 24/5/2001 at 22:49
Quote:
Originally posted by TechImmortal:
<STRONG>(Though I have no interest in being connected to the internet 24/7 - I want some peace :D )</STRONG>
That, I think, will cause more social bloodshed than anything. On Beyond Human, they were speculating that soon, we will all have a wearable computer, be 24/7 connected to the net, and every face you see you can pull up their bios, along with various comments other people have posted about them who have known them. Just think - every person you run into is going to see the trash written about you by your ex, a boss who fired you, etc. etc. :eek:
People think road rage now is bad... <IMG SRC="wot.gif" border="0">
TechImmortal on 25/5/2001 at 03:07
Either that, or people will start to be awfully careful about what they say ;)
Personally, there are things I want, but I sure don't want the equivalent of the damn Infolink. :rolleyes:
Sniper459 on 25/5/2001 at 17:08
HEY fEONIOUS THNX FOR CORRECTING ME ON the sr-71. And if you were wondering what kind of work I did at TopoMetrix check this out.
one thing we were able to do was take a picture of a single red blood cell and blow it up to a 4ft. x 4ft. poster w/o losing any resolution, (no pixelation whatsoever)
But the best thing we did with our microscopes is this:
DNA Splicing/Manipulation...
but the difference is this picture yourself in a room , a virtual room like in star trek, you have sensors on your hands and feet, and a virtual reality headset...
Now all around you you see a huge DNA double helix, imagine yourself reaching out and touching it with your finger, or grabbing a molecule and moving it around in this virtual world.
If your wondering what all this has to do with DNA splicing/Manipulation, wonder no more!!!
Because in another room there are nanotools and other various equipment that mimick your every movement all real-time. Hence the reason for wearing all of those little sensors. So essentially you could kick a piece of DNA and in reality it would fly to the other end of the petri dish...
There you have it.
See the major reason for doing this is for Cancer Research, Splicing out cancerous DNA from your genes, etc.
Sorry for the long report, but trust me it could be longer.
This Report was brought to you by Sniper(a fellow TAFFER, shhhh!) <IMG SRC="idea.gif" border="0">
TechImmortal on 28/5/2001 at 06:49
Sniper, you must work in North Carolina, yes?
