Papy on 22/3/2009 at 23:41
To be honest, I prefer having my "problems" than yours. :joke:
ZymeAddict on 23/3/2009 at 00:09
Quote Posted by dethtoll
If Ken Levine is not involved in Bioshock 2 then there may be hope yet.
I don't really see how he was the main problem. :erg:
Toxicfluff on 23/3/2009 at 00:24
Quote Posted by Yakoob
Again? Jesus...
Yeah, again. This ambition stuff is all too familiar. Still, Bioshock's success might have cleared the way for something that goes a bit further this time.
Kyumaru on 24/3/2009 at 08:53
Oh God, please keep Ken away from X-Com.
He might try to create a spiritual successor or something.
catbarf on 24/3/2009 at 10:21
Quote Posted by ZymeAddict
I don't really see how he was the main problem. :erg:
Maybe he wasn't the one calling the shots, but Levine came on these forums to reassure us that Bioshock was not going to be a watered-down version of SS2. When the game came out, and he disappeared, you can guess where all the blame went. So, rational or irrational, it seems that many people here have blamed the game's shortcomings on him.
Jason Moyer on 24/3/2009 at 11:02
Ken came here after the game was released and said that any "dumbing down" to the game design came from him and was totally voluntary.
Rogue Keeper on 24/3/2009 at 11:10
He actually had balls to came here after the game was released? Brave boy.
Koki on 24/3/2009 at 11:17
It's not hard to be brave on the Internet.
DaBeast on 24/3/2009 at 14:34
As far as I'm concerned Levine has nothing to feel ashamed about. Bioshock is magnificant. If it isn't shock2 enough for you maybe you're stuck in the past?
Rogue Keeper on 24/3/2009 at 14:44
Or maybe you're stuck in bad taste.
