Sulphur on 4/7/2011 at 21:39

---

You've had a bad day, huh?

I wasn't making an excuse, I was stating a reason for not following-up on your 'tongue in cheek' reply until much later (I'm ever so sorry for being polite), which exceeds the usual one-line snark requirement and somehow has a bloated follow-up paragraph to justify it. That's a whole lot of tongue in a whole lot of cheek. Also, good job on misinterpreting what I said -- I fail to see where I've twisted what you said into you defending Pixar somehow.

Also, it's clear you don't have a goddamn point worth arguing. You've never watched a Pixar movie in a theatre (and apparently haven't watched any anywhere else, either) in your life and you're ready to argue about a stupid semantic point about whether children like a movie that they're the primary audience for, made by a company owned by Disney? Isn't that fucking obvious? Why don't you get a clue and screw off instead of wasting my time?

Ko0K on 5/7/2011 at 03:14

---

I don't need a bad day to know what buttons to push to get you where you are now.

See, the reason you 'fail' to see where I'm coming from is because you are in denial. You don't present anything falsifiable to qualify your statement as a fact, yet you keep insisting otherwise. "Semantics"? I thought I was just calling your bullshit. Huh, apparently I was multitasking without even knowing.

PigLick on 5/7/2011 at 03:56

---

cmon dude, I thought even you were above such petty bullying tactics.

Sulphur on 5/7/2011 at 05:03

---

Tsk. I should've seen your banality for what it was earlier. Yet another meandering little chucklefuck on the internet. I'll keep that in mind for the future.

Sulphur on 5/7/2011 at 05:25

---

Ah, the final comeback of a troll. Glad to be of service, sunshine!