No, not another "will there be thief4" thread, but... - by Flux
nickie on 1/6/2008 at 07:07
BA, I thought sNeaksie was talking to me. :)
BrokenArts on 1/6/2008 at 13:42
Oh but he mentions me nickie, I'm just charming......I know. :p ;)
nickie on 1/6/2008 at 14:04
Yes dear - I know but I thought his comment was in response to me asking who had the wine. One of my primary interests as you know. :D
Shadak on 1/6/2008 at 18:46
I think maybe he singled you out because you started with "I could care less..."
Huckeye on 1/6/2008 at 19:51
Quote Posted by sNeaksieGarrett
okay, I suppose that is good enough evidence, but I'm going to remain skeptical until it is official.
unfortunately, I'm going to remain skeptical until its released. I can't do with another Xbox port, product activation, or any number of other things that could possibly plague the game. (this is my standard reaction to all new games, by the way, not just Thief).
BrokenArts on 1/6/2008 at 20:09
Quote Posted by Shadak
I think maybe he singled you out because you started with "I could care less..."
I
STILL could care less. :p
inselaffe on 1/6/2008 at 21:05
Well at least you still care then, that's the main thing :angel:
The Magpie on 1/6/2008 at 22:17
And since the other thread really IMO contains the vast majority of all the possible views and opinions concerning the topic, I'm just going to continue this thread with some semantics. 'Cause that's how I roll.
Shouldn't an expression of disinterest rather read "I couldn't care less", indicating that the detachment from the topic at hand is at a maximum? :cool:
--
Larris
as anal retentive as ever
Thief13x on 1/6/2008 at 22:27
Thief is Thief
that said I still havn't touched Thief3:p thanks to a POS laptop:mad:
Shadak on 1/6/2008 at 23:32
Quote Posted by The Magpie
Shouldn't an expression of disinterest rather read "I couldn't care less", indicating that the detachment from the topic at hand is at a maximum? :cool:
Yup, that's technically correct, but in practice the two mean the same