RavynousHunter on 28/7/2009 at 03:21

---

Considering a console port is all but inevitable nowadays, achievements are, by extension, also all but inevitable, especially in the case of the X360. Given that, they should at least make some kinda sense, and no more than 3-5 of them should be on the "ridiculously hard" level.

You know, something like (this is an example of doing it wrong): Complete a mission or rob a high-ranking target whilst running without being seen or heard and remaining still for no longer than 5 seconds.

This example may be a tad extreme, but its not a far cry from some of the achievements I've seen on some of the games I've played.

Also, I must insist there be no secret achievements. Seriously, wtf? That shit's just retarded, either tell me what I need to do or go butt a stump.

mothra on 28/7/2009 at 11:52

---

I always thought achievements were invented for Newbies that don't understand the basic principles of a game/genre or grasp how you could play it differently from how the tutorial/manual tells you to do. So basically for idiots. Needing artificial motivation to play a game again is just sad. But that should not hinder the dev team to include them. a good game is all about option that do not interfere with the game but tailor it to the customer while still retaining their original vision for the game.

jtr7 on 29/7/2009 at 00:54

---

"You taffin' SUCK!! You were told what to do and you just blundered your way through and only by some miracle happened to meet the barest objectives! UNBELIEVABLE! This deserves the dubious honor of the Very Lucky Hand of Glory achievement!"

jtr7 on 30/7/2009 at 09:00

---

HAHAHAHA! :cheeky:

RavynousHunter on 31/7/2009 at 05:19

---

Hey, now, let's be all-inclusive here. You gotta add the PSN...I'd add whatever the Wii's version of Live is, but frankly, I don't think many people give a shit at this juncture.