ticky on 21/9/2013 at 19:16
The realistic setting is far better in my opinion. It looks marvellous and creates a good atmosphere!
Shimonhead on 21/9/2013 at 20:39
I definitely like the Realistic better.
Purgator on 21/9/2013 at 22:43
Realistic for me too.
However, it is a DrK mission, so it's gonna kick ass no matter what!
Gish on 21/9/2013 at 23:09
Quote Posted by ticky
The realistic setting is far better in my opinion. It looks marvellous and creates a good atmosphere!
I like the dark one, gives it a unique atmosphere.
Pemptus on 22/9/2013 at 15:13
Whelp, depends on whether the mission's atmosphere is dreary/horror-like or not. Fun sandboxy roaming around with readables about those silly pompous nobles = realistic sky. Hellish creatures / plague / desperation / srs business = dark sky.
Alternatively, use whatever looks best aesthetically.
DrK on 22/9/2013 at 15:25
Quote Posted by Pemptus
Whelp, depends on whether the mission's atmosphere is dreary/horror-like or not. Fun sandboxy roaming around with readables about those silly pompous nobles = realistic sky. Hellish creatures / plague / desperation / srs business = dark sky.
Alternatively, use whatever looks best aesthetically.
The mission is a sandbox with a serious/desperate atmosphere.
That's why I'm asking, they both fit, be it aesthetically or for the atmosphere.
Roz on 28/9/2013 at 06:29
Just wonderful -- either one of them :) I can't wait!! (just back from playing SS2 100 hrs).
Hamadriyad on 28/9/2013 at 09:21
Dark version definitely.
By the way DrK, You will make Rocksbourg 4 and Rocksbourg 0 both? Amazing! I can't wait! It looks faaaaaar better than Thi4f.
DrK on 28/9/2013 at 09:30
Quote Posted by Hamadriyad
By the way DrK, You will make Rocksbourg 4 and Rocksbourg 0 both?
I worked on both for years, building a base map used for both of them. Now I focus on Rocksbourg 0
Once it's released, I'll either work on Rocksbourg 4 or gold versions of the first 3 missions.
