EvaUnit02 on 5/5/2010 at 07:47
Quote Posted by clearing
Гы гы.
If you're gonna insult someone, then man up and do it in their language. Stop hiding behind barriers, you Cyrillic alphabet typing pussy.
Yeah, those same screenshots were posted last night (
http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2010/05/04/behold-some-fresh-rage-images/) on RPS.
(
http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/images/10/may/rage2.jpg) This one in particular raises concern. Aside from post-apocalyptic hot pants in the centre there, everything looks disgusting. Awful low res textures on environmental features and objects, like the vending machine, the no parking sign, the graffiti on the wall. That isn't a post-processing DoF effect either, those are just revolting textures.
Gunsmoke pointed out to me that Id Software are known for their historically quality texture work and he's right, they pioneered texturing with fricking Doom.
These are like target rendered bullshots of the 360 build. Hopefully they come through on Carmack's promise of the PC version getting uncompressed textures.
Sulphur on 5/5/2010 at 07:51
Quote Posted by EvaUnit02
everything looks disgusting. Awful low res textures on environmental features and objects, like the vending machine, the no parking sign, the graffiti on the wall. That isn't a post-processing DoF effect either, those are just revolting textures.
why are you looking at all those when your focus should obviously be on the t-shirt? :confused:
PigLick on 5/5/2010 at 08:30
also fucking vending machines, enough already with the vending machines
SOMETHING DIFFERENT NOW PLEASE
june gloom on 5/5/2010 at 08:45
10:1 this is from the console version.
242 on 5/5/2010 at 09:34
Once again (Doom3), almost all look not convincing, mediocre at best.
Fragony on 5/5/2010 at 11:30
Mwah graphics look good to me. Doom 3 was shit but this like it's going to be a fun mix of ET and Borderlands. And I like Borderlands. A lot. If they can put that much detail in the huge fluid environments they claim to be working it's on top of everything. I mean it are the tech-wizards of the industry they will deliver a solid engine at least.
mothra on 5/5/2010 at 16:01
previews say it looks amazing - on XBOX !!!! so no guessing how the PC will end up looking :)
other than that I never expected this to be an RPG, like Willits says in all previews: it's about the growth of your arsenal. My best guess: Metro2033-like linearity with small hubs that just look enormous but a very atmospheric background for a tight story. Metro failed on a few levels and the shooting was bad (not that I don't like clumsy gunhandling but it was worse) so id clearly has the advantage with decades of FPS experience. I'm cautiously optimistic.
d'Spair on 5/5/2010 at 19:42
Quote Posted by EvaUnit02
Stop hiding behind barriers, you Cyrillic alphabet typing pussy.
I second that.
Quote Posted by 242
Once again (Doom3), almost all look not convincing, mediocre at best.
I two hundred and fourty second that.
Sulphur on 5/5/2010 at 19:50
It's id. They make shooters for breakfast. They're steadfastly oldschool in their ways, but the result is always playable. They're still among the best in the field when it comes to graphics. I'm more than cautiously optimistic.
That megatexture feature's blown the doors right off, and the exteriors show it. I know they're going for platform parity, but if Carmack says the PC version's going to feature uncompressed textures, I'll believe him. (I just can't find the quote where he did say it.)
