PigLick on 25/8/2011 at 09:40
dethtoll, koki? cmon the suspense man!
Matthew on 25/8/2011 at 10:41
Not sure it is polite to say, but what the heck, it's Papy. I just couldn't stick the supercilious tone of his posts any more.
june gloom on 25/8/2011 at 11:59
Knew it wasn't me, Matthew and I have a mutual respect for each other. :)
Only person I ever put on ignore was DaveW, but to be fair that's 'cuz if I saw one more post by him my head would explode.
Oh, I guess I also put jtr7 on ignore too, but that was after he sent me this long PM about how he's too retarded to enjoy things and I'm shitting on him by disagreeing with him or whatever and I replied with "NOSTALGIA" and blocked him.
Martin Karne on 25/8/2011 at 12:31
What in the hell is this thread about?
:confused:
N'Al on 25/8/2011 at 12:36
Colourful language.
Dia on 25/8/2011 at 12:57
I miss Kolya.
Rug Burn Junky on 25/8/2011 at 13:07
Quote Posted by raph
When it starts happening every single time and propagates and derails every thread with the slightest hint of debate in it, it's the sensible thing to do.
This is the false equivalency.
If he's just yammering away in a thread, I usually do ignore him. If I do pipe up directly in response to something he says, I'll generally provide no more than a post or two.
But when I post something without his involvement in any way shape or form, I get his blood-lust, death-match challenging of everything I say. And while I'd love to let most of it lie, hearing things like:[INDENT][INDENT]
Quote Posted by Sg3
However, with all that said, I couldn't help but notice that you've ignored a few contrary points of his which appear to be valid.
[/INDENT][/INDENT]is why I don't just let his bullshit stand. In the regular course on subjects with which I'm not engaged? Sure, let him yammer away, because I really, really, really, don't enjoy interacting with someone so fucking persistently, obliviously stupid. But I'm not going to sit quietly by when it's directly contradicting things that I personally have written, and others may take his words at face value. I'm trying to raise the level of knowledge, and when that's being directly undercut by his bullshit, we all lose.
So if you want to say that
he "derails every thread with the slightest hint of debate in it," then great, I agree. More specifically, he simply trolls and derails
every single substantive post I offer.
But I'm sorry raph, if you're going to buy into the illusion that this is some sort of bi-lateral problem, you haven't been paying attention.
Matthew on 25/8/2011 at 13:39
Quote Posted by dethtoll
Knew it wasn't me, Matthew and I have a mutual respect for each other. :)
I gots your back, bro.
Stitch on 25/8/2011 at 14:46
Either raph (and the similar "just ignore each other" parrots in this thread) don't realize how wrong CCToad consistently is, or they would rather his idiocy go uncorrected, which is a notion I find baffling.
Frankly, RBJ is doing this forum a service by wielding the claymore against an aggressively growing patch of weeds.
SD on 25/8/2011 at 15:19
Quote Posted by Briareos H
In other words it's high time we officially fill Strontium Dog's empty chair with CCCToad.
Oh, thanks a lot. Why not just compare me to Hitler instead.
The difference between me and CCCwhatever is that I was nearly always right.
