Kolya on 8/1/2012 at 13:19
Data manipulation of packets sent through optical fibre perhaps.
Ulukai on 8/1/2012 at 19:44
Quote Posted by Papy
How about distance / speed = time instead?
Yeah, that :D
Lazarus411 on 11/1/2012 at 14:18
It's just a cloaking device then? Well that's rubbish.
DDL on 11/1/2012 at 14:47
Science: rubbish.
And that's how we progress as a species, ladies and gents. :erg:
dreamcatcher on 11/1/2012 at 15:22
Quote Posted by DDL
Science: rubbish.
And that's how we progress as a species, ladies and gents. :erg:
take it easy, champ.
Papy on 12/1/2012 at 01:08
Quote Posted by Lazarus411
It's just a cloaking device then?
No, this is not a "cloaking device". It's a device which will alter a laser beam in a way that it doesn't interact with an event at a specific time.
Koki on 12/1/2012 at 08:02
Quote Posted by Papy
No, this is not a "cloaking device". It's a device which will alter a laser beam in a way that it doesn't interact with an event at a specific time.
You forgot to add a disclaimer that "event" in this context is [2000 words of barely comprehensible pseudoscience]
demagogue on 12/1/2012 at 08:22
It is a cloaking device in the sense that the whole idea of a cloak metaphor is that some area is getting constructed around an object that light can't or doesn't get into to detect it. Whether that area is constructed by bending light around it or by actually breaking the light up into bands that gap over it is sort of just semantics. It's a device, and there's a cloak of non-interaction around the thing, at least as long as it stays inside the gap. What more do you want?
