Jason Moyer on 26/12/2008 at 22:32
Quote Posted by Koki
I must have missed that part in CoD5!
Did you find a way to skip all the Japanese missions?
Koki on 27/12/2008 at 09:18
We definitely must've played different games. Japs hardly threw any grenades at all.
theImmortalThief on 10/2/2009 at 20:57
CoD5 shouldn't be compared with CoD4. There are two separate teams of developers working on the CoD titles. 3 and 5 were made by one team while 2, 4 and the future CoD6 (Modern Warfare 2) are by the other team. This allows the teams to work parallel, thus the games can be pumped out into the market at a much faster rate.
In my opinion the team that made 2 and 4 is far superior to the 3 and 5 team. CoD5 is basically a continuation of what was done in CoD3, not 4.
Immortal
june gloom on 10/2/2009 at 23:10
Uh dude you do realize that CoD1 was made by Infinity Ward, right?
gunsmoke on 11/2/2009 at 01:30
LOL, I think he got it a bit backward there..........
EvaUnit02 on 11/2/2009 at 06:55
Also his point is wrong. CoD5 was considered a high quality shooter by most whom have actually played it. A big improvement over CoD3, Treyarch were vindicated.
theImmortalThief on 11/2/2009 at 09:00
I didn't say that CoD5 was a bad game. I said that it shouldn't be compared with CoD4 and be expected to build upon what was achieved in that game.
EvaUnit02 on 11/2/2009 at 09:04
Exactly what was achieved by CoD4? Other than the overhauled multiplayer with RPG aspects, it was pretty much a CoD2 Total Conversion mod.
Koki on 11/2/2009 at 09:23
I'm just going to say that ultimately I had much more fun with Cod5 than I did with 4. One nuke explosion and one STALER nostalgia trip does not a game make.
theImmortalThief on 11/2/2009 at 09:23
CoD4 was a totally immersing experience in which the moments of total chaos actually felt like total chaos (unlike some parts of the previous CoDs which tried to achieve that simply by a lot of flying bullets and flares). The parts where the player was forced use some vehicle/aircraft were the real high points in the gameplay. In previous CoDs these parts usually sucked. Even if the developers of CoD4 didn't totally revolutionize the game (which they didn't), the gameplay was far more gripping than the previous titles, in my humble opinion (which you may not share).
I admit, I haven't played CoD5 a lot (I played it on a friends computer), but what I saw, although visually stunning, gameplay-wise was more of the style of CoD3, not CoD4 (and I don't mean the modern aspects). It may be a very good game, but it seems obvious to me that the game is a highly improved version of CoD3, not CoD4.
