Renzatic on 10/6/2009 at 07:08
no i'm mad now :mad:
jtr7 on 10/6/2009 at 07:25
:laff::laff::laff:
YuSeF on 10/6/2009 at 07:40
Lets read some Hammerite scripture to aid our friends at EM in hopes of finding the source code. May the Builder guide EM in finding this holy relic.
MoroseTroll on 10/6/2009 at 08:23
YuSeF: +1 :).
Queue on 10/6/2009 at 12:49
Quote Posted by YuSeF
Lets read some Hammerite scripture to aid our friends at EM in hopes of finding the source code. May the Builder guide EM in finding this holy relic.
Instead, let's just send 'em some top-shelf stuff as a lubricant to free up those sticky wheels a bit.
jtr--
WiiChewbubba on 10/6/2009 at 14:45
Signed #703. :cool:
MoroseTroll on 11/6/2009 at 05:35
Chewbubba: Thank you :)!
P.S. 706 signs so far.
MaxDZ8 on 12/6/2009 at 11:48
Quote Posted by eddy
T3 is probably much more unrealistic, because they licensed the Unreal Engine and most likely don't have the rights to give away the source code to a third party, let alone open sourcing it.
Not to mention it has nothing to do with the problem being solved: Dark Engine. Not Epic tech.
Even in the case this becomes a reality, it is not going to help. I bet UnrealEngine doesn't even know who Garret is. I'm reasonably sure T3 is mostly mutators(UScript), because this is how Epic suggests to use their tech.
Summing up, taking T3 in the picture helps nobody.
MoroseTroll on 15/6/2009 at 07:27
Quote Posted by MaxDZ8
Summing up, taking T3 in the picture helps nobody.
Maybe. But right now there is no "picture" at all - I mean no evidence of T1&T2 source existence. So, if we'll get a real proof of their...annihilation, it could be in place to ask Eidos for the T3 source, IMHO.
BTW, I cannot open (
www.petitiononline.com:confused:). Does anyone?
PotatoGuy on 15/6/2009 at 08:10
Me neither.
