SubJeff on 29/8/2012 at 12:43
I really liked Clue. Tim Curry ftw!
N'Al on 29/8/2012 at 12:47
It was vaguely amusing, yes (and Curry certainly helped), but good as such? Not so much.
nicked on 29/8/2012 at 20:03
Maybe it's because I'm young and have perfect vision (hahaha!) but I have honestly never even noticed shaky-cam in any film ever, let alone been distracted by it, except for deliberate camcorder-y ones like Cloverfield.
dj_ivocha on 30/8/2012 at 08:29
More like perfect lack of vision if you didn't notice the shaky cam in Supremacy and especially Ultimatum. :eww:
I heard the new one doesn't have that crap so I'm gonna go watch it in the cinema, even if it doesn't actually have Bourne in it...
Pyrian on 31/8/2012 at 18:10
Liked it, mostly. Starts a bit slow.
catbarf on 1/9/2012 at 02:39
I always loved the Bourne series because it hit very close to home for me. Is the new one still the same vaguely plausible espionage thriller style, or is it going more sci-fi as Muzman suggested?
Scots Taffer on 1/9/2012 at 03:07
Same principle. They just expand on the "pills" that are offhandedly referred to in Identity by Clive Owen's character to delve into viral genetics that are the reason behind the pills. That's as "sci-fi" as it gets. The rest is espionage/survival/evasion/combat.
Fafhrd on 2/9/2012 at 08:24
Tony Gilroy pretty famously hated the changes that Greengrass made to his adaptation, so it seems safe to assume that the enhancement idea was more or less where he wanted the trilogy to go from the beginning.
