Thief 4: the ONE Mandatory thing. - by 5tephe
Shimonhead on 15/5/2009 at 15:23
Keeper Rune Magic.
Loved it in Thief 3. Would love to see it in Thief 4. Hope it's not actually 'Gone' now.
jtr7 on 15/5/2009 at 15:27
If it exists, it's not as we know it, or it needs to be found again. Basically, the Keepers all agreed from century to century that the Glyphs would cease to exist, completely. It may also be a localized thing that can be brought back in form outside The City, but that doesn't sound right.
Shimonhead on 15/5/2009 at 20:16
Maybe the key on the back of Garrett's left hand mean's he is now the sole Keeper with the ability to use it...? Since he set up the Last or Final Glyph to be used and is now marked because of it...
llorona on 15/5/2009 at 20:56
Crunchy Deer Legs
René on 15/5/2009 at 21:00
On top of spending time here at the TTLG forums, jtr7 sent me a very well written document that compiles a bunch of community feedback. I will be forwarding it to the dev team. Certainly they may have to make some tough decisions, but there's no doubt they know what the community wants!
jtr7 on 15/5/2009 at 22:01
Excellent!
To verify, it's a compilation of the specific comments from the '(
http://www.ttlg.com/forums/showthread.php?t=120596)
No, not another "will there be thief4" thread, but...', and the compilation was
not put together by
me. Another forum member took the time to do it and I merely sent it.:angel:
One document, a hundred voices....
bukary on 15/5/2009 at 22:06
So... can we see this document?
YuSeF on 15/5/2009 at 22:26
Quote Posted by René
On top of spending time here at the TTLG forums, jtr7 sent me a
very well written document that compiles a bunch of community feedback. I will be forwarding it to the dev team. Certainly they may have to make some tough decisions, but there's no doubt they know what the community wants!
Rene, it is nice to know that EM has a representative such as yourself on this forum. I think it says EM does care what the community thinks.
jtr7 on 15/5/2009 at 22:39
The document's certainly not comprehensive, and compared to that thread, it's pretty brief. I'll link it later, but for now I hope you'll understand the hesitation, as I would love to give credit where credit is due, but with the animosity on the boards right now, I believe it will be disastrous if people feel their suggestion was omitted thoughtlessly, dismissed as unimportant, or if the compiler becomes a target, when 90+ pages were distilled for the EM team to read easily.
Thank you for your understanding.
Iceblade on 15/5/2009 at 22:52
I understand, but it would still be interesting to see what was suggested to them.
