kamyk on 7/1/2009 at 10:32
I wish I'd had the time to play all of these and vote. So far the ones I have played have been fantastic. I'm guessing NV on Affairs of Wizards, and Lady Rowena for The Tower. Dunno about Ashes and Dust (without cheating :p), but it was great too.
Ladies, and Gentlemen. Drum roll, please...
Nameless Voice on 7/1/2009 at 13:32
Since the voting deadline is long past and the results are about to be released, it should be safe enough to post my predictions without affecting anyone's voting.
I predict that the missions will come in this order:
[spoiler]The Tower
The Affairs of Wizards
Ashes and Dust
Falling Down
Weekend Getaway
An Old Friend
The Kindred Vault
Bad Intentions
Flowers for a Friend
Vampire Skull
The Homeless Dude
Yume No Rozen
[/spoiler]
(Unfortunately, I somehow missed playing "Weak Links", so I haven't included that in my predictions.)
Ottoj55 on 7/1/2009 at 13:55
my scores, not predictions of anything
Ashes and Dust 7.7
The Tower 7.7
Falling Down 5.7
Weak Links 5.7
Yume No Rozen 5.7
Affairs of Wizards 5.3
Kindred Vault 4.7
Bad Intentions 4
An Old Friend 4
Homeless Dude 4
Vampire Skull 1.3
Flowers for a Friend 1.3
Nameless Voice on 7/1/2009 at 14:18
Are those averages?
e.g. 1 Story + 2 Design + 1 gameplay( *2 ) = 5. 5 / 4 = 1.25 rounded up to 1.3?
Lady Rowena on 7/1/2009 at 14:26
Quote Posted by Nameless Voice
(Unfortunately, I somehow missed playing "Weak Links", so I haven't included that in my predictions.)
So....maybe you made it then? :sly: Just kidding....:cheeky:
Ottoj55 on 7/1/2009 at 14:37
it was 1 space 1 story 2 gameplay, and yes they are averages, ashes and dust raw score was 5 space, 8 story, 5 gameplay. space reflected my estimation that the atrium was a large unused space, the strange stairs from the library to the study on the other side and lighting that was bright in places. story was excellent with an evolving plot, a nice plot twist etc. gameplay was average, i ko'd the ai and had the run of the place until the plot twist happened, even then, i charge the book, drew my sword, chopped it down and ran back the exit point before the enemy ai could stop me.
(5+8+(5*2))/3=7.7 which was how i interpreted the scoring, it was a weighted average of three inputs, but it seems that what they really meant was (5+8+5+5)/4=8.25. this wouldn't change the ordering i placed the missions in at all against my final scores. the entire voting portion of the contest was a little slipshod, rules were never posted on the host sites, and were buried deep inside a thread instead of attached to the first post.
i did email the raw scores in, so hopefully the organizers corrected my math mistake to their scoring, i however will stick with my numbers, they feel right to me.
Sticky Fingers on 7/1/2009 at 14:45
Quote Posted by Shadak
The ratings tabulation will count "Game Play" twice as strongly as the other two categories. So the final scores will reflect 50% weight on "Game Play", and 25% weight each on "Design" and "Story".
I assume it'll be an average out of 10 (rather thah total out of 40).
So, e.g:- Design 5, Story 4, Gameplay 8 would mean 6.25 (2x8 +5 +4 =25, then divide by 4).
EDIT: ah, Otto beat me to it.
UliB on 7/1/2009 at 15:42
Hmmm, i posted my results via pm to shadak here at ttlg on the 30 Dec. 08.
I activated the "Request a read receipt for this message". My results are still on status "unread". Either Komag forgot to check this account or he is busy with s.th. different. :confused:
Vasmarok on 7/1/2009 at 16:30
Besides the final overall ranking of the missions, for me there are two honorable mentions:
Technical Originality: The Affairs of Wizards
Artistic Originality: Yume No Rozen
Nameless Voice on 7/1/2009 at 23:19
It's nearly the 8th here... we're waiting... :devil:
