eepcat on 9/1/2009 at 16:32
Quote Posted by pavlovscat
If any authors care to update their readmes & zips, I will be happy to update the files at Darklurker. You can pm me a link, if you prefer, or post it.
Thank you - I will take you up on that, but not just yet. I'm considering adding a short briefing video and a couple of tweqs (like a method for disabling the fire arrow trap on Expert) then re-releasing it with free lollipops.
- eep!
Random_Taffer on 9/1/2009 at 18:28
Quote Posted by Nameless Voice
And there I was thinking it was unfair to vote when I was one of the contestants.
I didn't vote either, for this reason.
ghost_in_the_shell on 9/1/2009 at 21:08
Hey pavlovscat, it seems that the link incidentally leads to Yume No Rosen instead of Weak Links ;)
I just noticed that. Sorry for bothering you again.
pavlovscat on 9/1/2009 at 21:14
Fixed...in both threads. Can't read my own handwriting! I should have just pasted the link. :tsktsk:
ghost_in_the_shell on 9/1/2009 at 21:24
Thank you once more :thumb:
You are the cat of all cats! :D
Lady Rowena on 10/1/2009 at 05:02
Quote Posted by ghost_in_the_shell
Ah, I get it. Probably doable to recognise it this way, as I used much of what I learned working on The Box (which was my debut release, and the only one until TAC) to create Weak Links. Probably some details and solutions are very similiar :thumb:
At least I'm sure I put 'anonymous' as username for dromed info_window ...
But I suspect what else could identify me as I think more about it now. Either some strange, but distinctive objects names in dromed or my convention of naming objects in objnames.str file... am I close? :erm:
Also I guess my readme file was recognisable, as I used the one from The Box as a base for contest one. :sweat:
I'm embarassed......:o I could have sworn that I saw your nick in the info window.....but it was just my imagination, I suppose. I have guessed it, then. :)
Lady Rowena on 10/1/2009 at 05:07
Quote Posted by Nameless Voice
Oh, that's clever. Give really bad votes to all the missions but your own (which you're not allowed to vote for anyway) to lower their average and give your mission a boost. Makes me think I should have voted, too... And there I was thinking it was unfair to vote when I was one of the contestants.
Quote Posted by Random_Taffer
I didn't vote either, for this reason.
For my part, I tried to be as honest as possible, in accord with my likings, of course. First was Nameless Voice's mission, 2nd Random Taffer's and 3rd Jason Otto's, because even if I wasn't strictly forced to ghost it, yet being a blackjack maniac I didn't like the gameplay.
I must agree though, maybe the contenders shouldn't be allowed to vote at all. :erg:
Durinda D'Bry on 10/1/2009 at 08:45
Just got a chance to look contest results. Congratulations, Lady Rowena:thumb: And wonder why Falling Down was so underrated:mad:
ghost_in_the_shell on 10/1/2009 at 09:23
Quote Posted by Lady Rowena
I'm embarassed......:o I could have sworn that I saw your nick in the info window.....but it was just my imagination, I suppose. I have guessed it, then. :)
No need to be embarassed - It's called feminine intuition I think :cheeky:
And why I was asking is just called curiosity :)
So... Playing TAC FMs was fun, building was fun, guessing (or 'tracking' as I would call it, I not consider it 'cheating' when you use more or less obvious clues left in zip archives ;) ) authors was also fun. And rating missions was also fun for me, but I get the point that it opens a way to some scores' boosting (up or down) for contest participants, so if next time voting of contestants won't be allowed I will agree with that.
