Renault on 24/1/2012 at 17:55
Quote Posted by New Horizon
With the source code they can patch the game to run on modern equipment.
Right, I get that part, but even with the source code, a certain amount of work would still be involved in getting the thing configured/programmed/whatever I would think. Whereas ddfix is done and ready to go, and I'm guessing it can be distributed freely without restrictions, much the same way Gog uses Dosbox.
jermi on 24/1/2012 at 18:30
Not quite. Dosbox is GPL, while ddfix is not under any licence - which means you have to have some sort of an agreement, or risk being sued by the copyright holders.
Albert on 25/1/2012 at 15:14
Yeah, now would be a good time to license DDFIX under something. :erg:
Koki on 25/1/2012 at 16:54
"Be the best cold-blooded killer"
Sounds like Garrett allright
redface on 25/1/2012 at 18:29
That's Hitman, so yeah, Eidos is coming to GOG.
Lurox on 26/1/2012 at 14:53
Anyone else shares my opinion that we should all...
1 - Get down to Montreal and threaten to give all Eidos Montreal employees a tar and feather treatment?
2 - In the alternative, register en masse on the eidos forums and RIGHTFULLY DEMAND information regarding Thi4f?
....
I guess I'm desperate. And frustrated.
jtr7 on 26/1/2012 at 21:18
Don't bother with either.
Dia on 27/1/2012 at 00:58
Quote Posted by Lurox
2 - In the alternative, register en masse on the eidos forums and RIGHTFULLY DEMAND information regarding Thi4f?
....
I guess I'm desperate. And frustrated.
You'd probably just end up getting yourself banned over there. The only consolation I can offer is that you're not alone; the rest of us Taffers are just as frustrated and just a tad pissed off at the lack of T4 information. Re: #1: I can't afford a trip to Montreal at the moment. Sorry.
;)
wonderfield on 27/1/2012 at 02:06
Quote Posted by Albert
Yeah, now would be a good time to license DDFIX under something. :erg:
Or dedicate to the public domain.
Thelvyn on 27/1/2012 at 03:04
Quote Posted by wonderfield
Or dedicate to the public domain.
They should license it. Why should eidos be able to use it to make more money without compensating them ?
