Vivian on 30/5/2013 at 13:50
Redefine it as what, badly-taken photos of people wearing primark underwear? Nice try. Also, why is this nsfw? It's just someone pretending to talk with their butt-cheeks.
Sorry, bit negative. Do you.. ahem ... do you have any better examples of how you are going to redefine erotic art? Which has been, what, a pretty incredibly broad class of art for quite a few hundred years and includes god-knows how many acknowledged masterpieces. Just saying.
on the other hand, if you are taking the piss, reasonable job? I would have used comic-sans for the typeface though.
driver on 30/5/2013 at 13:55
Is this Sypha Nadon's new account?
DoTheGeek on 30/5/2013 at 14:02
Wow, so I see that many of the forumgoers here are really stuck up. Just waiting for the next argument, flame opportunity, opportunity to make fun of someone, whatever. Well I happen to love humiliation.
Dia on 30/5/2013 at 14:05
Good to know since 85% of ComChat members are sadists.
Lurk more.
Vivian on 30/5/2013 at 14:08
MATE. If you are serious, then you haven't even used a bloody vectorised font. It looks like a chinese bootleg of a Greg Araki film.
On the other hand, the more I look at it with the sentence 'redefining erotic art' going through my mind, the more I enjoy looking at it. So it does have entertainment value. Do a video.
Vivian on 30/5/2013 at 14:14
I can see the pixels! It's been rasterised then blown up too high. Or it's just too skinny for the resolution you made the image at? Anway, it gives it kind of a odd vibe. Like an old VHS intertitle made by people without too much money. Maybe that's on purpose.
DoTheGeek on 30/5/2013 at 14:15
I love pixels.
Vivian on 30/5/2013 at 14:18
Erotically?
