dj_ivocha on 5/6/2011 at 22:33
Quote Posted by EvaUnit02
(
Red Faction) This is not X-Com.
Of course it isn't. Duh. It's Red Faction. :erm:
dexterward on 11/6/2011 at 00:34
Quote Posted by Jason Moyer
I think this is looking fantastic, and far more interesting than the original games.
I take it you`ve never played the "original games", or dislike turn based strategy - otherwise you`d never utter such nonsense.
Regardless of the above, after reading some recent preview I got quite interested too - up till now I was convinced they`re just using the name to front some generic corridor rubbish.
Jason Moyer on 11/6/2011 at 00:56
Saying that item A seems more interesting to me than item B doesn't lead to the conclusion that item B does not interest me.
This may be the first time this has ever been said. I should probably apply for a grant to develop this idea further.
june gloom on 11/6/2011 at 01:55
Quote Posted by dexterward
I take it you`ve never played the "original games", or dislike turn based strategy - otherwise you`d never utter such nonsense.
Man, you just
got here, stupid opinions are for people who've been here at least six months.
Koki on 11/6/2011 at 05:23
Wow! Everyone said it's going to be a joke and series rape and it turns out it's a joke and a series rape.
How would that even work?
polytourist97 on 11/6/2011 at 06:29
Are those conveniently placed chest high walls I see in the suburban neighborhood as well as in front of that mansion?
Muzman on 11/6/2011 at 07:35
In the US in the fifties civil defense insisted on the placement of chesthighwalls as often as possible. In fact most ordinance surveys of the time have a section collating the placement of cover on a district by district basis.
Seriously though; crap trailer, still potentially good game. Somewhere down the page there are departments where die hard Thief and Deus Ex fans are berated for not allowing enough change in their respective franchises. I don't see why X-Com fans should get off scott free.
dexterward on 11/6/2011 at 12:06
Quote Posted by Jason Moyer
Saying that item A seems more interesting to me than item B doesn't lead to the conclusion that item B does not interest me.
Ah, semantics! Ain`t they just cute? ;)
Don`t backtrack man, if you say that some vague trailer makes you more interested than the seminal original means simply you never had time for it in the first place - or didn`t recognize it as seminal.
Quote Posted by dethtoll
Man, you just
got here, stupid opinions are for people who've been here at least six months.
Must`ve missed that clause in the FAQ. Sorry.
