Fafhrd on 14/2/2011 at 21:59
Quote Posted by EvaUnit02
Batman didn't murder him. In fact he even tried to save the fella, but obviously failed.
(
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DOuPmtq6raA) Nope. Apparently you've let your understanding of the character from the animated series, and the more recent films and comics taint your memory of '89 film, where Batman has no compunctions about killing whatsoever.
Ko0K on 17/2/2011 at 21:34
So, it looks like Fox made a marketing decision to milk the brand yet again. I'm not sure what else I'm supposed to see here other than that bottom line.
Thirith on 18/2/2011 at 08:28
Quote Posted by Ko0K
So, it looks like Fox made a marketing decision to milk the brand yet again. I'm not sure what else I'm supposed to see here other than that bottom line.
To me it's the director that makes this, at least possibly, more than just a money grab. Just like Darren Aronofsky doing
Wolverine 2, Matthew Vaughn has done good work with a certain flair, so he's got a chance of making a decent film in my eyes. (The cast is also interesting, but you can get great casts in total moneygrabs without any other merit.)
