The Blob on 30/3/2006 at 04:41
Quote Posted by Agent Subterfuge
Athlon 64 x2 dual 4800
2 gigs of ram
ATI radeon..erm, 1900 xtx something
250 Gig Western D sata drive
Soundblaster X-fi
I hope it run teh oblivian? -_-
Always one of ya who overdoes it... some of you insane powergamers.
But, at least you didn't have the FX-60 then you'd really be nutjob. :p
Dirty_Brute on 30/3/2006 at 06:17
People love to show their Epenises.
Malygris on 30/3/2006 at 07:51
Quote Posted by fett
So what's the general opinion of me trying to run this with my sad little Raedon 9600? It's supported on the low end, did fairly well on the diagnostic. But I'm afraid. :sweat:
I'd give it a rip. It's running quite well on my 9500, although I've flashed and overclocked the crap out of it. Ram seems to be an issue as well; friend of mine is running a 9700 but only 512 meg (I have a gig installed) and mine seems to be performing significantly better.
Fig455 on 30/3/2006 at 10:32
Quote Posted by fett
So what's the general opinion of me trying to run this with my sad little Raedon 9600? It's supported on the low end, did fairly well on the diagnostic. But I'm afraid. :sweat:
It's not video card dependent. You can salvage some performance w/adecent processor and a gig + of RAM.
BlackCapedManX on 30/3/2006 at 18:29
Quote Posted by fett
So what's the general opinion of me trying to run this with my sad little Raedon 9600? It's supported on the low end, did fairly well on the diagnostic. But I'm afraid. :sweat:
I have a sapphire Radeon 9600 which usual seems to run amazingly well (I could play Doom3 with maxed video settings on 1024x762 and still had enough FPS to outstrafe 4 imps wihtout taking a hit). I'm playing Oblivion on 640x420 with lowest video setting and on full draw I got a frame about every 40 seconds when I went outside.
So I fear for you too.
Henri The Hammer on 30/3/2006 at 19:24
- AMD Athlon 64 3000+
- 1 GB RAM
- Radeon X800 XL
The game set it automatically to 'high quality', but I had to reduce it because of unbelievable lag *hint-12fps-hint*. And I thought it wouldn't lag so much, I first tested it with all setting maxed, 1 frame per 6 seconds.
I've also tested it on my friends computer:
- AMD Athlon 64 3200+
- 512 MB RAM
- Radeon 9600 XT
Ran pretty fine with 640x480 all setting medium.
(Man this game is awesome! Best game ever! :p)
EDIT: Oh, my other friend said that he could run Oblivion on his computer (Pentium 1,7 GHz, 768mb Ram, Radeon 9800) with all settings medium and 800x600 without lagging at all?! :weird: I have to check out if that's true...
io organic industrialism on 30/3/2006 at 23:06
Quote Posted by Renzatic
eVGA Geforce 7800GS (because I wasn't quite ready to spend an extra $200 to join the PCI-e crowd just yet)
oh man.... i just wrote a huge long spiel about how you wasted a bunch of money on this because you wouldn't be able to upgrade your graphics card any further since you were locked into agp... but then i looked at the mobo and see that it is dual pci express and agp ...
but it still begs the question .... ??? why did you get the agp? a pci express 7800 gt can be had for the same price as a GS, and it has 4 additional pixel pipelines. the gt will give you roughly 10-15 performance increase over the GS.......
???
PeeperStorm on 31/3/2006 at 02:32
Quote:
People love to show their Epenises.
I would, but you'd have to get a bigger monitor.:D
Dirty_Brute on 31/3/2006 at 05:16
Awesome! Welcome to the 7800 GS club. :thumb: Remember that these are very overclockable. Don't hesitate to squeeze out extra frames for games like Oblivion and Fear.
Pfft! I remember them saying that AGP is dead. Well, according to the latest hardware survey taken from Steam, the majority of us players still use AGP as opposed to PCI-E.:)